User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Packaging

Hi

Do you have an opinion? And if both should be deleted or not and why. Regards Panam2014 (talk) 12:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: The Nutella example is quite borderline IMO, but this is not OK without a permission. Yann (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. And for Rouiba, is one of the three quite borderline too? Panam2014 (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Panam2014: The Nutella may be OK only because the design is a small part of the picture. If the picture focuses on the design, it can't be OK. Yann (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And for File:Le Tartinage De Daronne.jpg? Panam2014 (talk) 00:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And for File:Potdenutella.jpg and File:NutellaDispenser.jpg and File:Mercado de Testaccio. Roma (3420929580).jpg and File:Australiafanta2lpet.jpg and File:Nutella (50995087661).jpg and File:Woman with Nutella - Souq Waqif - Doha - Qatar (33804085443).jpg? Panam2014 (talk) 22:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Panam2014: File:Woman with Nutella - Souq Waqif - Doha - Qatar (33804085443).jpg is most probably OK. I deleted some, for the rest please create a regular DR. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will do the necessary.
Also. And for File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 坑口 Hang Hau 培成路 18 Pui Shing Road 海悅豪園商場 Maritime Bay Shopping Mall shop 民生 Daily Manson Store chocolate July 2021 SS2.jpg, File:Kinder Schokolade.jpg, File:Sweets 002.JPG, File:P2228067 (6774224272).jpg, File:KinderPinguiproductFoto.jpg, File:2023 Ferrero Rocher (1).jpg, File:Hamoud.jpg? Panam2014 (talk) 10:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted some of these. I would keep the rest. Yann (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I nominated 3 files mentioned above. Yann (talk) 08:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Sorry Yann, I thought we'd known each other long enough that a mild, casual joke wouldn't be out of place. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 21:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me why that is

I put up a picture of an Intel Core i5 14400 processor, which was extremely important for a paper I was developing. However, without any apparent warning or reason, that photo was deleted. This deletion caused me problems, since I need it to stay so the page is not horrible. There was no clear justification for this action, you only put that you removed it because it left commons and I went to see and it doesn't seem to have the reason, and I believe there should be more transparency or a system for the recovery of accidentally deleted data. Caio Vitoreti (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Caio Vitoreti: Your uploads are copyright violations, as images copied from the Internet without a permission. Even the files which might be OK need a proper source, or they will be deleted. Do not upload anything from the Internet, or you will be blocked. Yann (talk) 21:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can I put a proper source? Caio Vitoreti (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Caio Vitoreti: You can't put a proper source, as you are NOT allowed to upload these files without a formal written permission from the copyright holder. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure (the copyright holder should send the permission). Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How can I have this permission? I need the urgent photos for the items Caio Vitoreti (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

USAID photos on Flickr

Hello Yann, File:2018 Devolution Conference - Josphat Nanok.jpg is credited "Photo: Mwangi Kirubi/USAID". Template:USAID works are US government works, which overrides the Flickr permission. See Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2019/02#Whitelist_for_Flickr_accounts_belonging_to_federal_agencies_of_the_United_States Joofjoof (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done OK fine. Yann (talk) 08:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as death certificates in France go, are they above or below the ToO? Inclined to think above, but I wanted your input first. Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. These are very standard text, and there is no room for originality. I updated the license and the information. Yann (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo supprimée sur accusation erronée

La photo Francesca Musiani.png a été supprimée à tort. Elle n'a pas été récupérée sur une des pages Web citées et j'ai l'autorisation de l'auteur de la photo (ainsi que du sujet). Merci d'annuler cette suppression. Bortzmeyer (talk) 08:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bortzmeyer: Bonjour,
Merci de demander au détenteur des droits de confirmer l'autorisation de publication via COM:VRT/fr. Ceci est nécessaire pour tout document dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur, ou publié aupravant ailleurs. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed license

Hi, friend. I think you're free at this moment. So can you review the license for my uploaded photos in categories here:

Category:Wowy

Category:Bùi Công Nam

Category:Soobin Hoàng Sơn

Category:BB Trần

Category:Namcito

Category:Bảo Nhân

Category:Uyển Ân

File:H'HEN NIÊ (cropped).png

File:PHAN THỊ MƠ.jpg

Category:Jarinporn Joonkiat

Category:Lâm Bảo Ngọc

Category:Myra Trần

File:DƯƠNG HOÀNG YẾN.png

Category:Thùy Anh

That's all. Hope you done all of these. Have a nice day. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw you recently deleted this for NETCOPYVIO. I wonder what the basis? Ubuntu is free software, and the screenshot was taken by the uploader. Aaron Liu (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aaron Liu: The image displayed is not free. Yann (talk) 11:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it a {{Freescreenshot}}? Aaron Liu (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, would you kindly respond? Thanks. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aaron Liu: Is the image displayed directly from the installation? Yann (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what that means. The uploader says they installed Ubuntu in a VM and took a direct screenshot, and I see no reason not to trust them. Aaron Liu (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK fine. Yann (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I just saw that the file page was vandalized to remove licensing information. Could you check if the user has other deleted contributions? Thanks again! Aaron Liu (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted everything, and warned the user. Yann (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Import sur Commons de rééditions de livres publiés initialement il y a plus de 95 ans

Bonjour, @Yann, je suis en train de préparer l'import des ouvrages disponibles de Creator:Colette qui entre dans le domaine public le 1er janvier prochain. Un certain nombre d'entre eux sont des rééditions des années 1960 à 1990 de livres publiés initialement il y a plus de 95 ans. Ces rééditions sont-elles admissibles sur Commons, ou devrais-je plutôt les importer directement sur Wikisource ? Cunegonde1 (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunegonde1: Bonjour, Si c'est exactement le même texte, il est dans le domaine public. Mais, 1. C'est difficile à vérifier. Il est souvent indiqué « édition mise à jour / augmentée », mais dans le cas contraire, cela demande de comparer le texte d'origine avec l'édition récente. 2. C'est rarement le cas. Il y a souvent des ajouts récents : une préface, une introduction, des notes, etc., qui ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Désolé, c'est un peu une réponse de Normand... ;o) Yann (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci @Yann, parfois la version d'origine est indiquée, d'autres fois c'est la date de copyright d'origine qui est indiquée, par exemple sur des livres de poche des années 60. Bon, le plus simple pour moi est d'importer sur Wikisource les textes dont je suis certain qu'ils sont DP. Il arrive que j'ai des scans d'origine, mais qui sont tellement pourris, que c'est plus simple d'utiliser un scan plus récent. Merci pour ton aide. Cunegonde1 (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete it so fast? It is only first day of nomination. It is photo of tiles in historical building, and human legs are needed to underastand what size of tiles (for comparison). This photo may be useful for article about this building. Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Yann (talk) 16:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad faith"

Yann, you are an admin. You presumably know User:Rosenzweig is not acting in bad faith in the Harcourt matter, but you keep making that accusation. Please knock it off. Genuine disagreement is not bad faith on either side. Frankly, given the precautionary principle, he has a damned good case. - Jmabel ! talk 19:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Sorry, but I lost good faith with Rosenzweig. In the new nomination, there are images which are obviously OK. How can good faith be assumed when he nominated again the same images with the same wrong rationale? Also grouping several rationales into one DR is bad. But he does it again here. This looks like just a personal war against these pictures. And I am not alone thinking that. Yann (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are serious in the accusation that he is acting in bad faith, take it to COM:AN/U and be prepared to make your case. If not, drop it. And certainly a DR is not the place to argue the conduct of any longstanding member of the community. - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This could be done, but I still hope it won't be necessary. I usually look for a reason for keeping an image. When there is none, the image must be deleted. In opposite, Rosenzweig looks for reason for deleting images at all costs. More than that, he has a wrong understanding of copyright and public domain. Copyright is not a black and white story. It is mostly nuances of grays, specially for old pictures. He also pretends to know more than French people how copyright management is done in France. So he is antagonizing dozens of people with his insistence of deletion with bad rationales. All this is simply damaging for the projects. Yann (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Terteryan

Hi since it seems you handled the other uploads perhaps you can assist with this too: given history of the uploader using images taken by others, this File:Sebastian Terteryan jpg.jpg is somewhat unlikely own work either. I'm unsure how to proceed, there's a similar but not identical here https://www.tiktok.com/@sebtheboxer TherasTaneel (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I found the source, deleted. Yann (talk) 09:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gperez24.jpg

Hola Yann, ¿por favor, me podrías decir exactamente cual es la evidencia que quieres encontrar en la foto para asegurarte que la foto es mía? Yo personalmente saqué esa foto el pasado mes de octubre y en la autoria de la imagen indique que poseo el copyright. No entiendo el motivo por el cual se pone en duda mi autoría, cuando he subido otras fotos de manera similar y no he tenido problemas. Gracias por adelantado. UN cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hard: Please upload the original image with EXIF data. This is good portrait by the way. Yann (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola @Yann, muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta. Voy a buscar el original y lo subiré directamente a Commons con los datos que comentas. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
<Google Translate>Sube la imagen original con los datos EXIF. Por cierto, es un buen retrato.</Google Translate>

Hola de nuevo, @Yann: , acabo de subir la foto. Espero que todo esté correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hard: File:Gperez2024.jpg n'est pas l'image originale, mais une version très réduite, et sans EXIF data. Si vous ne pouvez pas importer l'image originale, merci d'envoyez une autorisation via COM:VRT/es. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
<Google Translate>File:Gperez2024.jpg no es la imagen original, sino una versión muy reducida, y sin datos EXIF. Si no puede importar la imagen original, envíe permiso a través de COM:VRT/es.</Google Translate> Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Yann,
Acabo de enviar el correo:
Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de Gperez2024.jpg [1].
Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (BY-SA-4.0).
Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.
Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas.
Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.
Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.
(He firmado con mi nombre real (Hard)]
1 de noviembre de 2024.
Espero que esté todo correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda!. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hard: This should be sent to permissions-es@wikimedia.org. Thanks, Yann (talk)
@Yann: si, disculpa por no incluir el destinatario en mi mensaje. El mensaje que te envié lo había enviado a la dirección que me señalaste. Gracias de nuevo. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: ya está solucionado. MUchas gracias por tu valiosa ayuda, sin la cual posiblemente no habría podiso solucionar este asunto. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2014 in Occitanie

Bonsoir, un grand merci pour ton aide. Your request is malformed m'a été d'un grand secours pour ne pas comprendre en quoi elle était malformée. En tant qu'enseignant, j'apprécie autant de pédagogie. Bonne soirée. --Birdie (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

I'd love to know how exactly a multi-paragraph section explaining what "Monuments historiques" are with a "see also" and "External links" section isn't "encyclopedic content." I guess I could just renominate it for G1 since it only has a single image but the whole thing really just comes off as pointlessly nitpicky and I'm sure you'd come up with some other reason to revert it anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I don't really care if you revert me but I would like an explanation and/or for to tell me what I should use instead if G2 isn't valid. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]