User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:B dash)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

A kind request - please stay away from my Flickr and refrain from importing files the moment I release them. I see you uploaded files while I was already prepping them to upload. Thank you. I hope for your cooperation. Meanwhile, reconsider your deletion request, while you upload protest banners. Labrang (talk) 06:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work? --A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And while I am at it - why do you upload a rather pointless photo like this - File:Preparations for government orchestrated event (53684050396).jpg? Or do you just use some automated algorythm to transfer snatch all license applicable photos into commons, regardless their actual value? Is that how it works? Labrang (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the filename automatically generated by F2C. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly the problem. Mass-import just because you can. Mind you, what's the difference according to you between this photo and this photo Labrang (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have blurred the copyrighted element.--A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You did not when you uploaded it initially. Do I understand you correctly you now confess to violation of the rules that you apply to others?
Mind you - this derivative act takes away the whole purpose [message] of the banner - so please consider to have the photo deleted altogether, if that particular element makes it a copyright violation. Thank you. Labrang (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And please, indicate what is the element in the other image that you nominated that is the problematic part? Labrang (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The boots, and the icon of Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How are the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) protected work? And again, please delete the other photo with the crocodile and ivanishvili. This takes away the entire purpose of the banner. This is more vandalizing than helping anything. Labrang (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And please, confess you applied rules to me (3:46) that you deliberately did not apply to yourself (3:42). Labrang (talk) 10:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for any inconvenience. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least that is clear. And the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) are not protected work. They are just a private drawing similarly to wall graffiti. Wall graffiti in Georgia - we have plenty of. Labrang (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not do that Labrang Trade (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sub reaction

[edit]

""If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work?" - that was not my message. I was preparing SOME photos to be transferred and indeed had uploaded some extra photos to my Flickr and adjusted the license appropriately - so in that case there was nothing wrong with that as such, except for the fact that I took a break from the screen and overnight you transferred the photos, while I was prepping them already in Commons with different file names - only a few hours after I had them uploaded to Flickr / changed license. This feels like prying. Also, as result, there are now some duplicates. Do you sniff Flickr and snatch any photo that you see the minute it is released under a lower license? The fact that a photo is adjusted to a lower license doesn't OBLIGE you to upload them the minute they are released. Right? Labrang (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded those photos 12 hours after your license change, not "minute" right? Also such photos are easily search on Flickr, and it is unfair to blame me "prying" Flickr stream. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the case, it simply feels that way. Regardless how easy it is to find such photos in Flickr. I have noticed various Commons people pry on Flickr and upload whatever they can without checking the actual (additional) value for Commons. Not saying that is the case here - although your eagerness to upload whatever is free license, while at the same time also looking for whatever you can nominate for deletion seems to make you sloppy for what you upload yourself. Anyways, have a nice day. Labrang (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not like own work

[edit]

183.182.120.206 10:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F2C ban

[edit]

Per Special:Diff/937465669, you are now indefinitely blocked from using Commons:Flickr2Commons due to your lack of care to ensure that the transfers are not duplicates, copyright violations, or front-running creators who prefer to upload their own images. King of ♥ 21:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: If you decided to block me based on "front-running creators", then this is very pity, as I can never know which Flickr user wish to import their images by themselves, and they have quite different name on Commons and Flickr. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point is not about the fact of whether you are importing images created by people who are also active on Commons, but the spirit of whether you are doing something that disregards others' preferences just because it is legal. -- King of ♥ 06:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: I admit that I under-estimate somepne's preferences at first, but I agreed and made a promise to stop importing from Jelger Groeneveld's (Labrang) Flickr stream, after Krd asked me to respect photographer's request. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't just about any single issue. The consensus is that your Flickr imports in general have been problematic for many different reasons. -- King of ♥ 07:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: There is still someone opposes it, so it is hardly to say it reached a consensus. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the oppose !voters were opposing a total site ban, but many of them still noted issues with your use of F2C. So the end result is that basically everyone who expressed an opinion on that topic was in favor of revoking your access (at a minimum). -- King of ♥ 06:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: Fine, I won't argue on this anymore, though I still feel that it is very pity. Do you have any suggestions that what is the appropriate time to appeal it? --A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i believe 6 months to 1 year. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 16:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel, You just had this happen, and you choose to continue uploading from Flickr, but using a different tool that is depreciated and broken? Please take a clue, and don't do Flickr uploads to commons for at least 6 months. Flickr is only one website on the internet, I'm sure you can find images to upload under compatible licenses. If you can't, consider helping import fonts under the Open Font License. No one wants to block you, but its moving ever closer towards that direction when things like this keep hapening. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear violation of the spirit of your F2C ban. When I specified that you may use other means to import images, I hoped that you would understand the motivation behind your F2C ban (hasty low-quality transfers) and refrain from similar behavior such as using a different automated tool, so that I wouldn't have to spell out explicitly what needs to happen. Unfortunately that has failed, so I will be more clear:

  1. You may not use anything other than the Commons website (e.g. Special:UploadWizard or Special:Upload) to upload images to Wikimedia Commons.
  2. You may upload no more than 10 images per day.

Violations will be enforced by blocks. Again, the consensus in the discussion was that you were uploading too many images too quickly without proper care, so these restrictions are intended to force you to carefully vet what you upload. -- King of ♥ 05:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: Just to be clear, can I upload 10 more files today? Or I need to wait until tomorrow? --A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have already uploaded more than 10 files today, so please wait until tomorrow. Days will always be counted using UTC. -- King of ♥ 08:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts, See the 13 files uploaded on 18 October 2024 here: [1]. This appears to be a violation of number "2. You may upload no more than 10 images per day.". (This count does not include the single cropped image, also uploaded on the 18th) I am assuming that the "Special:ListFiles" results are shown in UTC as you noted above. -- Ooligan (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ooligan: I only see 10. Perhaps you are looking at a time zone other than UTC? -- King of ♥ 02:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please check everything carefully before you make such accusation, this is not the first time you make wrong accusation. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was not UTC. Sorry, to take your time @King of Hearts, and my appology also to A1Cafel. -- Ooligan (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to categorize FOP cases

[edit]

Hello. If you have time, can you categorize the FOP cases created by this user? Their response on their talk page regarding my request to categorize such case pages does not seem to be helpful. Majority of the cases are Uzbekistani, but I'm not sure if there are other country/ies involved. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: Finished. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not like own work

[edit]

183.182.121.243 10:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, // sikander { talk } 🦖 02:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

[edit]

Copyright infringement 183.182.121.243 10:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by Jmabel--A1Cafel (talk) 14:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify: simply nominated in DRs. - Jmabel ! talk 14:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:241030-D-PM193-3115 (54105857444).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:241030-D-PM193-3163 (54105582571).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]