Comments on: Reducing the Pressure on HERS Rater Class Students

By: Allison Bailes

Allison Bailes — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:35:02 +0000

Thanks, Sam! I'm really
Thanks, Sam! I'm really enjoying teaching my own class now. It was a lot of fun teaching with Mike, too, but I like having control over the curriculum and the format. This first class has been great, and I have lots of ideas now about how to make it even better for our October class.

By: Sam Bagwell

Sam Bagwell — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:22:05 +0000

Allison,

Allison,

It is great that things are going well with your first class. I am pulling for you. A great result thus far - of course you can do 100% again.

Let me say again that I am impressed with the way Energy Vanguard is going.

By: Scott Doyle

Scott Doyle — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:12:28 +0000
I was also bothered last year
I was also bothered last year by the sentiment that the market couldn't be changed.

You are correct that we already have a two week class, but we teach both BPI Building Analyst and RESNET HERS. If anything, this format is more intense and demanding on students than a five day class for one or the other. There is some overlap in the basic building science, so we are able to add more field/practical, but I am not satisfied that it is enough.

I am ooking forward to changing the paragigm as well!

By: Allison Bailes

Allison Bailes — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:40:48 +0000
You and I have reached the
You and I have reached the same conclusion, Scott - 5 days is not enough time for most students to master all the skills and knowledge needed to become a home energy rater. For someone who's an engineer or physicist, it's enough, but for the majority, understanding pressure, psychrometrics, and heat flow is a challenge. The brain needs time to assimilate all this new information, and 5 days isn't enough. Even 8 days isn't enough for students to really learn the material, but they get a much better start than with a 5 day class.

I also hate the idea of teaching to the test, which is another reason to go to a longer format. In our first 5 days, we were able to focus on the building science, pressure testing, HERS protocols, and math. The students got to work through a lot of the problems and think through the issues.

It sounds like you know what you have to do next, Scott. Make the leap. It shouldn't be too hard for you guys to expand it because aren't you already teaching a 2 week HERS/BPI class?

I, too, look forward to presenting with you at the next RESNET conference on this topic. One comment I heard too much last year was, "Market forces dictate a one-week HERS rater class." Let's change that paradigm!

By: Scott Doyle

Scott Doyle — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:16:25 +0000
Very interesting post,
Very interesting post, Allison. And I must say, congratulations on the impressive pass rate. I have several students from our most recent HERS training making their second attempt at the exam this week. We always strive to find that balance in our HERS trainings and I hate the idea of just 'teaching to the test'. I would like to incorporate more field work and 'hands on' training in our classes. But if we go overboard there, our pass rates on the exam tend to drop. We're committed to producing quality raters, so I'm not defining success solely on pass rates. The exam is a necessary step, so if I want to spend more time on practical training and still have reasonable pass rates, I will either have to improve the quality of materials/instruction, implement a screening process for students, or ditch the 5 day format. For several years now, we've placed our focus on improving the quality of our product by surveying our students and re-evaluating after each and every class. While I'm certain we can still improve there, I think ultimitely getting away from the five day format is best for us and best for the industry.

I hope you and I will have the opportunity to present a session on this topic at the National RESNET conference in Orlando.